News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hitting Absolute Zero Has Been Declared Mathematically Im... by thehardsphere on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @02:04PM (#13878305)
I am not a mathematician and I did not read the actual paper, so forgive me if I beclown myself with this question.

Isn't this a nothingburger? How would you hit absolute zero anyway when the minimum joint uncertainty of any given particle's position and momentum must be greater than Planck's constant / 2?

Re:Hitting Absolute Zero Has Been Declared Mathematically Im... by contravariant on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @08:37PM (#13881309)
Temperature in this sense no longer has anything to do with kinetic energy. A quantum system at absolute zero would simply be in its ground state, which is perfectly possible. In open space you only run into problems that there's not a particularly clear minimum.

You do run into some problems with quantum fluctuations which may or may not randomly add energy to the system, I guess that's what this new result is about.

Re:Hitting Absolute Zero Has Been Declared Mathematically Im... by timthelion on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @03:10PM (#13878863)
It seems to me that uncertainty is more uncertain a theorum to base your beliefs about the universe on than entropy.
Re:Hitting Absolute Zero Has Been Declared Mathematically Im... by thehardsphere on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @03:21PM (#13878951)
True perhaps, but we're relatively certain about uncertainty.
Re:Hitting Absolute Zero Has Been Declared Mathematically Im... by AstralStorm on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @04:41PM (#13879570)
Basing it on entropy makes certain assumptions on topological properties of time and space though.
Re:Hitting Absolute Zero Has Been Declared Mathematically Im... by amelius on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @02:38PM (#13878598)
Also, all the other particles in the universe will exert a force on the particle (through e.g. gravitation), which will probably result in (small) vibration of the the particle.