News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Mumps Programming Language. Parent comment

Re:The Mumps Programming Language by DanielFallon on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @02:52AM (#13874285)
lol... Last time I checked GT.M was way behind lightning fast by comparison to Intersystems' implementation
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Mumps Programming Language by dahakon on Friday March 17, 2017 @06:05PM (#13898393)
If you put the money you save on Cache licenses toward better hardware, GT.M will be faster. Cache would still be necessary only for the most demanding cases.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Mumps Programming Language by kdtop on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @08:55AM (#13921720)
Do you have a link to such a comparison? I would be surprised if similar tasks on similar hardware are different. Seems like I have heard that head to head comparisons are against the terms of service of Cache'.
[ Parent | on HN ]