Re:The Mumps Programming Language
by DanielFallon on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @02:52AM
(#13874285)
lol... Last time I checked GT.M was way behind lightning fast by comparison to Intersystems' implementation
If you put the money you save on Cache licenses toward better hardware, GT.M will be faster. Cache would still be necessary only for the most demanding cases.
Do you have a link to such a comparison? I would be surprised if similar tasks on similar hardware are different. Seems like I have heard that head to head comparisons are against the terms of service of Cache'.
The most important part about any computing system/language is the resulting application. Yes, it is nicer for programmers when they have advanced language features. But ultimately, the test of how "good" a language is should really be about how useful it is, and how widely it is used.
The wheel is very old technology and yet still very important.