Re:Reverse Engineering the Hacker News Ranking Algorithm
by saycheese on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @11:12AM
(#13868100)
It would be nice if there was non-filtered view of HN available for users with a rep above 500, much like the "show dead" option for user comments that have been hidden. Basically allowing the submissions to be placed in the submission rank as if their ranking was not pinged due to users flagging the submission.
Re:Reverse Engineering the Hacker News Ranking Algorithm
by bradleyankrom on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @11:19AM
(#13868177)
I like this idea, but it'd be nice to have it not based on karma (says a person that doesn't comment very often and has low karma).
Re:Reverse Engineering the Hacker News Ranking Algorithm
by saycheese on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @11:28AM
(#13868264)
Understand though I could easily see spammers using the data and getting 500 really should not take more than a month if you post a handful of comments a day; for example: 25 days, 5 comments a day, average of 4 upvotes per comment.
Worth noting with a rep of 500+ HN users are able to downvote comments.
Re:Reverse Engineering the Hacker News Ranking Algorithm
by bradleyankrom on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @01:00PM
(#13869266)
Yeah, and I think the karma system works well overall. It isn't ideal for people that are significantly more consumer than producer of content, but I would guess that is the minority.
Re:Reverse Engineering the Hacker News Ranking Algorithm
by tylorr on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @02:02PM
(#13869873)
I feel there are a lot more consumers than you might imagine, myself included. I'm on HN constantly but I rarely ever comment. The karma system is not for everyone.
Re:Reverse Engineering the Hacker News Ranking Algorithm
by DanBC on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @02:31PM
(#13870168)
I think there are a few people with > 500 karma, more with an account but less karma, and even more without an account.
Pareto principle and all.
Re:Reverse Engineering the Hacker News Ranking Algorithm
by hueving on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @08:31PM
(#13872879)
I'm not sure why that information would be valuable to spammers. It would only tell them that their posts are being flagged, but it wouldn't really help them get to the front page.
Re:Reverse Engineering the Hacker News Ranking Algorithm
by saycheese on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @12:29PM
(#13877284)
From the point a spammer is identify until their interaction with the system becomes a burden to deal with, it's better to not let them know it's known they a spammer. Craigslist does this by "ghosting" postings that's flagged as spam; that is the spammer sees the posting as live, maybe even gets an automated reply to see how/if they respond, but the general public does not see the posting.
Re:Reverse Engineering the Hacker News Ranking Algorithm
by mdekkers on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @11:51AM
(#13868534)
I consume HN via an RSS feed, and it is an excellent experience. I don't need a hivemind to do my filtering and thinking for me.
Re:Reverse Engineering the Hacker News Ranking Algorithm
by gus_massa on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @07:41PM
(#13872568)
if you don't need the filtering from the hivemind, you can read https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (I'm not sure if it has a RSS.) Warning: it's full of crap.
And you can enable the showdead flag. Warning: The worst crap is [dead] so this version has even more crap.
Anyway, there are from time to time some interesting articles that are unlucky and don't get even a vote, so after reading the front page please go to the newest page and try to find a hidden jewel there.
PS: There are a few alternative unofficial HN UI. They use alternative orders, probably without the official penalties. For example http://www.daemonology.net/hn-daily/ and https://hckrnews.com/
Re:Reverse Engineering the Hacker News Ranking Algorithm
by saycheese on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @12:00PM
(#13868637)
To be fair, "the feed" (assume you mean the new feed) is populated by the hive, it's just not sorted by votes or any other filter; of course unless the mods remove/hide a submission for some reason.
Re:Reverse Engineering the Hacker News Ranking Algorithm
by mdekkers on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @07:21PM
(#13872463)
I'm using /rss - I see a lot of stuff on there that subsequently gets flagged.
Re:Reverse Engineering the Hacker News Ranking Algorithm
by scoot on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @11:49AM
(#13868498)
It was asked by someone yesterday, but the question got lost in the noise, whether the voting ring detection extends to flagging rings (whether on posts or comments)?
It would be naive to assume that it doesn't happen...
The other bit was just my attempt to explain why users might have flagged the post. User flags were what demoted its rank, and it isn't obvious why people flagged it. There's also the issue that meta posts aren't great for HN in the first place, but those rarely lack for upvotes.