Re:A comment left on Slashdot
by andrewflnr on Monday March 13, 2017 @04:17AM
(#13856072)
The 20 year code monkey hypothetical is a bit of a red herring. A code monkey is... of limited use however old they are. You always prefer someone who's learning. However, someone who has been learning for 20 years is far more valuable than a curious noob. Those years on the job make a big difference in ability.
Re:A comment left on Slashdot
by pleasecalllater on Monday March 13, 2017 @04:34AM
(#13856131)
This is something that companies should pay attention to: knowledge, experience, will of learning. And that's more important than age, sex, location. However I doubt that it will change.
On the other hand, somebody that has deeply learned their craft and is still actively learning makes a very attractive employee. Age and number of years on the job by themselves say nothing about ability.