I'd say it depends on what you mean by "good". E.g. the Swedish system probably compares well to the US one in terms of (average) medical outcomes [1], but in terms of "customer satisfaction"... that's a different story.

(Personally I feel "real" / objective health is more important than the subjective "customer satisfaction" aspect of health care, but yea, I guess that's politics.)

1. E.g. http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Sweden/Unit...