That's the price you pay for a web that isn't controlled entirely by governments or the media. The alternative is some service like Facebook determining what the truth is on your behalf, and you becoming nothing more than a pig feeding at their trough.
People cite disinformation, bad information and "fake news" as evidence that the web is broken, but it's not. That's evidence the web is working as intended - the problem is with the humanity it's reflecting.
My N=1 anectada seem to show the opposite:
More trustable correlates with no gimmicks and ads - Wikipedia, academic articles, expert's and organization's blogs, sometimes even HN.
Less trustable correlates with flashy - average online news, facebook & co.
(as I said, N=1, bare with me)
This should be on top.
Wikipedia I think is a small picture of what it could look like. Especially if better monitors are enforced.