News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What the CIA WikiLeaks Dump Tells Us: Encryption Works by wyager on Saturday March 11, 2017 @04:12PM (#13847285)
The protocol is secure, but we have no idea if the implementations are secure (except Signal itself), because we can't audit them.

In fact, Facebook Messenger's implementation of Signal has very questionable security right out of the box, because if one party "reports" an encrypted conversation, the whole thing is decrypted and sent to facebook support staff.

Re:What the CIA WikiLeaks Dump Tells Us: Encryption Works by espeed on Saturday March 11, 2017 @04:58PM (#13847484)
So someone reporting a message to Facebook would be the equivalent of that person (either Alice or Bob) reporting and sending the content of the other person's encrypted conversation to a third party.

The Signal Protocol provides end-to-end encryption so you don't have to trust the intermediate parties/servers involved in relaying the message (e.g. you don't have to trust Facebook's servers), and to protect against the other person reporting and revealing your conversation to someone else, the Signal Protocol provides message repudiation [1], which effectively gives the sender plausible deniability because the receiving party cannot prove to a third party that a message came from you.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_Protocol#Properties

Re:What the CIA WikiLeaks Dump Tells Us: Encryption Works by wyager on Saturday March 11, 2017 @05:21PM (#13847573)
Yes, my concern is that this functionality is baked into the client and is at a high risk of being executable remotely.