News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Alphabet adds patent claim to Uber intellectual property theft lawsuit. Parent comment

Re:Alphabet adds patent claim to Uber intellectual property ... by jacquesm on Saturday March 11, 2017 @10:10AM (#13845639)
That has a critical and hard to prove caveat: that at the time of the filing it was known what that 'best mode' was. And since parameters (such as the ones under discussion) are subject to change that could be very difficult, it involves the 'state of mind of the inventor at the time of filing'.

So, since 2012 this is now a requirement.

I've found two examples of this successfully used in litigation, they are referenced here:

https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2165.html

Bottom of the page, neither of those come close to Google not disclosing certain parameters.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Alphabet adds patent claim to Uber intellectual property ... by tclAmockingbird on Saturday March 11, 2017 @10:47AM (#13845763)
> So, since 2012 this is now a requirement.

It was a requirement before the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, which is what is meant by "pre-AIA". You stated that "'best mode' is not a requirement for a patent at all" which was incorrect pre-AIA and remains incorrect in the AIA era. Disclosure of best mode remains a statutory requirement, even though it now lacks enforcement.

Your citation is of MPEP 2165, which is what I had referenced earlier. Thank you for sharing a direct link for others to review.

[ Parent | on HN ]