News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Porting Ruby to Crystal by hashkb on Friday March 10, 2017 @10:38AM (#13839360)
> Using rubygems to distribute ruby code is sometimes done but then sometimes it’s frowned upon

Wat? Rails?

Re:Porting Ruby to Crystal by jdminhbg on Friday March 10, 2017 @12:56PM (#13840559)
The author means as a means to distribute programs and executables, not libraries.
Re:Porting Ruby to Crystal by squar1sm on Friday March 10, 2017 @01:15PM (#13840705)
Yeah, that's what I meant. :)
Re:Porting Ruby to Crystal by hashkb on Friday March 10, 2017 @01:21PM (#13840741)
OK... Rails is an executable too. So is Rake... tons of executables are easily installed and managed with Rubygems.
Re:Porting Ruby to Crystal by squar1sm on Friday March 10, 2017 @06:41PM (#13843125)
I think of Rake/Rails as dev tools that are executables. In the post, I mentioned passenger because that was using Rubygems as a distribution mechanism and then they stopped doing that. I don't know if it's a hard / fast rule or even who would enforce that rule ... I was just mentioning that maybe it's an anti-pattern?
Re:Porting Ruby to Crystal by cderwin on Friday March 10, 2017 @01:29PM (#13840822)
Development tools often are, but almost never exclusively using ruby gems and it's certainly not a universal practice. ANd of course non-dev tools can't be distributed this way.