Ask HN: Flynn.io/Hyper.sh/Nanobox.io vs. Kubernetes

Re:Ask HN: Flynn.io/Hyper.sh/Nanobox.io vs. Kubernetes by mrmrcoleman on Thursday March 09, 2017 @02:07PM (#13832073)

Hello, I'm working with Hyper. There are valid comments here about how much control you might want over your container stack. If you need total control, you should run your own k8s cluster or have someone else run it for you, like GKE.

Most of our users choose us because they don't want that level of control and maintenance.

I'm aware of Flynn but not sure how it works and I'm hearing of Nanobox for the first time.

I imagine however that they will be experiencing the same thing as us, lots of people running event driven workloads.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Flynn.io/Hyper.sh/Nanobox.io vs. Kubernetes by ianwalter on Thursday March 09, 2017 @02:30PM (#13832455)

I've used both Nanobox and Hyper and they seem to be set up for two different use cases with some overlap. Nanobox seems to be focused on the deployment of your custom application while Hyper is focused on letting you deploy whatever container to the cloud quickly and easily.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Flynn.io/Hyper.sh/Nanobox.io vs. Kubernetes by mrmrcoleman on Thursday March 09, 2017 @03:51PM (#13833459)

Thanks for the clarification. I'll check out Nanobox.

[ Parent | on HN ]