News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ask HN: Flynn.io/Hyper.sh/Nanobox.io vs. Kubernetes.

Re:Ask HN: Flynn.io/Hyper.sh/Nanobox.io vs. Kubernetes by nodesocket on Thursday March 09, 2017 @12:53PM (#13831183)
I am attending Google Cloud NEXT[1] right now, and there are a lot of breakout sessions on kubernetes and Container Engine. Google Cloud and Container Engine (GKE) makes creating a kube cluster super painless. It honestly just works and only takes a few minutes to spin up a kube cluster. GKE also has baked in awesomeness that is not available in the open source version such as automatic master and node version upgrades and automatic repair.

I'd recommend just using GKE instead of trying to run kubernetes on your own or using a lesser platform such as Flynn or Hyper. Google Cloud also has their own container registry which is nice since it is tightly integrated with GKE.

[1] - https://cloudnext.withgoogle.com/

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Flynn.io/Hyper.sh/Nanobox.io vs. Kubernetes by mrmrcoleman on Thursday March 09, 2017 @02:10PM (#13832107)
Hey, I'm with Hyper. Also at Google Next.

GKE is obviously backed by a company that isn't going away anytime soon.

Other than that, I'd be curious to understand your use of the word "lesser" in this context. Have you tried Hyper?

[ Parent | on HN ]