News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Apple starts rejecting apps with “hot code push” features. Parent comment

Re:Apple starts rejecting apps with “hot code push” features by cat199 on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @10:20AM (#13820810)
As a case of point - as a matter in fact For all intensive purposes this article peaked my interest because by in large it addressed a deep ceded issue with app updates
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple starts rejecting apps with “hot code push” features by ryandrake on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @10:54AM (#13821045)
Thank you! As a fellow "Correct Idiom Usage Nazi" that made my day. Have an upvote :)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple starts rejecting apps with “hot code push” features by retbull on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @12:26PM (#13821739)
Holy crap its `deep ceded` not `deep seated`?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple starts rejecting apps with “hot code push” features by xsmasher on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @01:29PM (#13822364)
No - the comment was full of intentional errors. "matter in fact" "For all intensive purposes" "peaked my interest" "by in large" "deep ceded"
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple starts rejecting apps with “hot code push” features by Cpoll on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @12:52PM (#13821989)
No, the reply was filled with eggcorns / mondegreens, i.e. misheard idioms.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple starts rejecting apps with “hot code push” features by spudlyo on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @12:23PM (#13821707)
Heh, nice! I'm a big fan of eggcorns[1] and your post is positively teaming with them!

[1]: http://eggcorns.lascribe.net

[ Parent | on HN ]