News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Taking the Gaia Hypothesis Seriously by amelius on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @05:26AM (#13819308)
Isn't reproduction one of the necessary conditions for life? How would that apply to a planet?
Re:Taking the Gaia Hypothesis Seriously by piva00 on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @05:35AM (#13819349)
The same as we apply it to living beings: we are made of specialized cells each doing their job to keep the whole system working, some of them are made for reproduction. Maybe planetary reproduction starts when one of its products colonizes another one (like us, humans)?

I know that's a very far-fetching idea/concept but I like to think in this way.

Re:Taking the Gaia Hypothesis Seriously by forthefuture on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @05:42AM (#13819379)
Life is a human construct. The rest of the universe just exists. We only place value in water based reproduction because it's what we are.
Re:Taking the Gaia Hypothesis Seriously by ivarious on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @05:42AM (#13819378)
Exo/planet colonization? Terraforming Mars, for example, will create a Mars that will (eventually) look like Earth.
Re:Taking the Gaia Hypothesis Seriously by jlebrech on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @05:34AM (#13819341)
It created us didn't it?
Re:Taking the Gaia Hypothesis Seriously by smsm42 on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @04:12PM (#13823842)
For extremely wide definition of "created", yes. But that definition is not very useful, since it implies pretty much no useful causal links, just the mere fact "here's a bunch of matter, and here we are located in this place on it". Yep, but so what?