CIA malware and hacking tools

Re:CIA malware and hacking tools by redahs on Tuesday March 07, 2017 @06:11PM (#13816096)

> because they've never published anything that wasn't verified to be true

Mr Assange repeatedly claimed that Podesta's gmail password was 'password' in interviews, which was false:

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2017/jan/06/...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CIA malware and hacking tools by jwtadvice on Tuesday March 07, 2017 @06:46PM (#13816409)

This is a far, far cry from the kinds of quality journalism that Wikileaks does. It appears that the claim the password was 'password' wasn't a story in and of itself but an anecdote relating to the weakness of Podesta's password (which is true).

Compare that to Clapper, Director of National Intelligence stating for the record under oath that national intelligence does not have a surveillance operation targeting Americans in the homeland. That was a lie and one intended for testimony.

Assange here is just saying: Podesta's password is weak. It's hard for him to qualify that it was spelled "p@ssw0rd" rather than "password" during an interview.

The fact that you think saying "password" rather than "p@ssw0rd" disqualifies Assange as a lier goes to the heart of the anti-body reaction that nationalists have about hearing news that doesn't validate pre-existing opinions that they have about the nobility of their nation and its leadership.

The difference between "password" and "p@ssw0rd", while technically true, it is so pedantic it does not apply to the spirit of the conversation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CIA malware and hacking tools by dragonwriter on Tuesday March 07, 2017 @07:01PM (#13816512)

> Compare that to Comey, Director of National Intelligence

There is no Comey who has ever been Director of National Intelligence. I suspect you mean Clapper.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CIA malware and hacking tools by jwtadvice on Tuesday March 07, 2017 @07:06PM (#13816533)

Yes. Correction made in the parent comment.

Thank you.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CIA malware and hacking tools by redahs on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @02:31AM (#13818624)

You are missing the point that the "p@ssw0rd" was for a Windows 8 account, not the gmail account. There was no evidence that the gmail account password was a variant of password. It would still be disingenuous even if he claimed it was a 'variant' of password, because there is no evidence to suggest it was.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CIA malware and hacking tools by mdashx on Tuesday March 07, 2017 @06:43PM (#13816388)

right... so it was something like `p@SSw0Rd`, what's the difference?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CIA malware and hacking tools by redahs on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @02:25AM (#13818602)

We don't know the email password was something like `p@SSw0Rd`, only that a staffer temporarily set a Windows 8 password to a variant of password. This does not mean that the gmail password was a variant of password. It was disingenuous of Mr Assange to claim his email password was password, as the only indication we had of a password being a variant of password was for a Windows 8 account and not the email account.

[ Parent | on HN ]