News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Snap Tumbles Below IPO Opening Price as Analysts Say Sell by CobrastanJorji on Monday March 06, 2017 @08:12PM (#13807574)
I'm no startup expert, but I imagine part of it is that the company's owners (founder, VCs, etc) would like to reap some rewards of their successful endeavor and diversify their riches into other businesses. That means finding buyers, which is presumably most easily accomplished by going public. It's great to build a billion dollar business, but it might as well not exist until you sell some of it to someone.

I imagine that going public, simply by creating a lot of new shares, is also an effective way to raise additional capital, which could be used to grow the company more, similar to a private fundraising round but larger in scale.

Re:Snap Tumbles Below IPO Opening Price as Analysts Say Sell by taneq on Monday March 06, 2017 @11:16PM (#13808236)
> It's great to build a billion dollar business, but it might as well not exist until you sell some of it to someone.

This statement is boggling. Only in Silicon Valley can a "billion dollar business" be worthless except for the price of its shares. Anywhere else, "billion dollar business" implies some kind of actual revenue.

Re:Snap Tumbles Below IPO Opening Price as Analysts Say Sell by CobrastanJorji on Tuesday March 07, 2017 @06:24PM (#13816223)
A giant diamond is also worthless unless you can sell it to someone.