Re:Revised executive order bans travelers from six countries...
by daenney on Monday March 06, 2017 @01:25PM
(#13804785)
> How do you know this? It might.
And based on an "it might" it's fine to just assign blame and pass judgement?
> I'd bet being Muslim inclines somebody to not be a criminal for some types of crimes, in fact, so I wouldn't categorically dismiss the idea that religion affects criminality.
In fact? By what facts?
Re:Revised executive order bans travelers from six countries...
by SamReidHughes on Monday March 06, 2017 @02:00PM
(#13805088)
> And based on an "it might" it's fine to just assign blame and pass judgement?
What on Earth are you talking about?
> In fact? By what facts?
The fact there is regarding the question of what bet I'd make. "In fact" is a common figure of speech.
How do you know this? It might. I'd bet being Muslim inclines somebody to not be a criminal for some types of crimes, in fact, so I wouldn't categorically dismiss the idea that religion affects criminality.
Also as has been well-discussed here, crime rate differences are still present in non-economic crimes and your attempts to explain the situation fall flat. It's a story you're making up, badly, and to talk about this stuff with that kind of certainty is a bad look. The truth is, we don't know.