Re:Australian software engineer got asked algorithm question...
by HappyDreamer on Sunday March 05, 2017 @04:46AM
(#13795264)
Why would the airport managers [edit: I mean immigration officers] be able to find engineers who can devise good tests? Why would they be able to find the right people to verify the tests on?
IMO companies have a hard time finding talented software developers. I'd expect the airport managers [edit: immigration officers] to find not-very-competent people who come up with the very wrong tests.
Re:Australian software engineer got asked algorithm question...
by tropo on Monday March 06, 2017 @07:30PM
(#13807380)
Internet connectivity means they only need one person on duty at the central office. If this weren't immigration law enforcement, they could even outsource it. :-)
Re:Australian software engineer got asked algorithm question...
by TuringNYC on Sunday March 12, 2017 @06:41AM
(#13850138)
I suppose they could hand out iPads while we're on line and have us complete HackerRank exams. So if someone is a plumber, would they provide a set of pipes to connect? What about a heart surgeon? That might get messy...
Re:Australian software engineer got asked algorithm question...
by HappyDreamer on Thursday March 09, 2017 @02:57PM
(#13832848)
That's a good point. They could have an office with people on duty that remote-interviews everyone about all different kinds of jobs. Not saying it'd work well (no idea if it would), but I do think it'd work (a lot?) better than the scenario I first imagined.
Re:Australian software engineer got asked algorithm question...
by ubernostrum on Sunday March 05, 2017 @04:40AM
(#13795244)
One of the recent stories indicated border agents were literally comparing answers against a Wikipedia article; if you didn't have the answer in the Wikipedia article, you were wrong.
This would be in line with, for example, how Google does early-stage screening -- non-technical people are given a sheet of questions, and if you give an answer that's not verbatim what's on the sheet you're "wrong" and "not qualified" (see http://www.gwan.com/blog/20160405.html).
I doubt the question would be framed like that. They probably hired real engineers to write the questions and then tested if those work properly on other real engineers.