News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by jdietrich on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @06:26PM (#1378847)
I think a lot of us have forgotten that once upon a time, computers were considered thinking machines, not just glorified internet teletypes. Computers were world-changing machines long before we joined them all together.

Given what RMS does all day and what seems to matter to him, this seems perfectly rational to me. Consider how old the GNU tools are, or how long some of them go between revisions. I don't think Stallman needs or wants to keep up with things in real time. I think Stallman is like Tolkien's Ents - he isn't slow, he's just operating on a different timescale to the rest of us.

It's the same sort of logic behind Tim Ferriss not answering his phone or Don Knuth doing his email in six-month batches - if you create enough latency in your connection to the world, you bring everyone else to your pace and avoid having to worry about minutiae. It's amazing how many problems resolve themselves when given sufficient neglect.

Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by ellyagg on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @06:51PM (#1378910)
From my favorite president:

If you see ten troubles coming down the road, you can be sure that nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.

- Calvin Coolidge

Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by hegemonicon on Wednesday May 26, 2010 @08:35AM (#1380116)
Of course, at some point letting problems work themselves out just becomes laziness.

"Mr Coolidge's genius for inactivity is developed to a very high point. It is not an indolent inactivity. It is a grim, determined, alert inactivity, which keeps Mr Coolidge occupied constantly" - Columnist Walter Lippmann, 1926

Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by tailrecursion on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @07:26PM (#1378991)
"Bring[ing] everyone else to your pace" by increasing latency struck me as a really nice idea. It suggests an additional feature that could be added to a site like Hacker News, where each reader can choose an update interval, and have news delivered on that interval.

The key is to use a ranking procedure that is appropriate for the interval, so that the reader doesn't get new stuff for that day, but the best over N days (or N seconds -- not everyone is Richard Stallman).

This feature may be silly and unoriginal; but I'm commenting on the internet so I thought it fit.

[Edit: when I said "delivered" I didn't mean by email! Just "updated".]

Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by jpwatts on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @10:42PM (#1379351)
What you're describing reminds me of the Mathic system in Neal Stephenson's book Anathem. The characters are sequestered in groups defined by the interval at which they interact with the outside world.

There's a good summary of Mathic life at http://anathem.wikia.com/wiki/Mathic_Society (the site contains spoilers, but that page looks safe to me).

Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by mhartl on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @08:20PM (#1379103)
Though not configurable, the "Top Links" feature does something like this:

http://news.ycombinator.com/best

It's really useful, but it's somewhat obscure since there's no link to it from the main page. (You can find it under "Lists" at http://news.ycombinator.com/lists)

Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by doron on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @08:03PM (#1379072)
This reminds me of the project SlowMail

i only could find the cache: http://bit.ly/c9dWWF

Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by KERMIT on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @09:36PM (#1379252)
Don't use shortened URLs here, please. This isn't twitter; post the full URL.
Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by RevRal on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @11:43PM (#1379445)
The url goes to a May 20, 2010, google cache.

Why? [edit: Okay, I didn't see that he could only find the cache. Just for future reference doron, at the top of the webshot is displayed the URL.]

Here's the URL unshortened and uncached: http://www.slowlab.net/slowmail.html

Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by doron on Wednesday May 26, 2010 @12:02AM (#1379472)
I know, the web-server did not respond at the time of posting, that is the reason why i posted the cache, and therefore didn't see the reason to post the full URL.
Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by scott_s on Wednesday May 26, 2010 @11:27AM (#1380494)
Because I want to know where I'm going before I click the link.
Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by ErrantX on Wednesday May 26, 2010 @05:20AM (#1379879)
I'm starting to implement a rough buffer of 48 hours on all my email replies. Unless you are a) a personal friend b) this is your first email to me or c) it needs addressing within 48 hrs.

It seems to be working so far - my productivity has gone up and the pace of email correspondence has slowed (so a 10 email conversation takes a couple of weeks now rather than a few hours).

Several people have commented that they enjoy talking with me for this reason; they don't feel pressured to reply "right now" and enjoy getting a response after some undetermined delay.

I sometimes wonder if the march of technology has had some downsides in terms of "right here right now" thinking.

Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by eru on Thursday May 27, 2010 @12:05PM (#1384052)
How are you implementing your buffer? If you just add 48 hours delay to everything, that would probably not work very well. (And you probably aren't?) I guess if you just have a batch email answering session every 48 hours, that should be very good for your productivity.
Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by eitally on Wednesday May 26, 2010 @01:12PM (#1380828)
It also gets people quickly into a mode of understanding that email isn't, and shouldn't be, considered a method of synchronous communication. There isn't much that bugs me more on a daily 8-5 basis than inappropriate [ab]use of email.
Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by apinstein on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @07:20PM (#1378980)
It's also amazing how many opportunities you miss by not answering the door when one knocks.
Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by crystalis on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @07:42PM (#1379032)
How many more opportunities do Don Knuth, Tim Ferriss, and Richard Stallman need?

Surely everyone who knows to consult Stallman knows how to operate a GNUsignal.

Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by njl on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @10:37PM (#1379346)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Murray

"Being very detached from the Hollywood scene, Murray does not have an agent or manager and reportedly only fields offers for scripts and roles using a personal telephone number with a voice mailbox that he checks infrequently. This practice has the downside of sometimes preventing him from taking parts that he had auditioned for and was interested in, such as that of Sulley in Monsters, Inc, Bernard Berkman in The Squid and the Whale, Frank Ginsburg in Little Miss Sunshine and Willy Wonka in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. He also regretted losing the chance to play Eddie Valiant in Who Framed Roger Rabbit when he heard that he was considered for the role, which he says he would have definitely accepted."

I don't think turning down major opportunities through outright neglect is ever a good habit, even for those with a surfeit.

Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by ZeroGravitas on Wednesday May 26, 2010 @04:36AM (#1379835)
So someone with 20/20 hindsight has gone through and chosen the good films. How many turkeys did he miss via following the same system?
Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by indrax on Wednesday May 26, 2010 @02:13AM (#1379655)
This is good fodder for an alternate history fiction.
Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by apinstein on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @08:25PM (#1379114)
:) well mostly I was countering this point:

> It's amazing how many problems resolve themselves when given sufficient neglect.

True, but there's a big downside.

Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by jodrellblank on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @09:22PM (#1379226)
Is it? How would one know?
Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by jessep on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @06:45PM (#1378895)
I have two friends who correspond with Tim Ferriss via email. Both say he gets back within 5 minutes every time.
Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by jdietrich on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @06:58PM (#1378926)
Somebody got back to them, but unless they're really important or know him really well, it probably wasn't Tim: http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2008/01/21/the-holy-gra...
Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by klochner on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @07:21PM (#1378984)
Let's be real here. Tim wrote a fun book with great suggestions to offload a lot of your own work, but he's also a master of PR that works his ass off.
Re:How Richard Stallman Browses the Internet by bmj on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @09:25PM (#1379236)
It's amazing how many problems resolve themselves when given sufficient neglect.

This is my new favorite quote. I've never thought about it that way, but it is quite true.