Okay, this is a little challenging to describe, it is something that I've always been able to do. I've tried to describe it to many people, but so far only ~3 people have successfully executed the technique.First, practice a "false hiccup". Do this by mildly inhaling, then abruptly close off the inhalation somewhere in the throat. There should be some kind of "vacuum" effect that feels similar...
We're looking for people with the audacity, the gumption, the gall to save the world. We're looking for people to join an ambitious project ---regardless of technical aptitude --the most important quality being bravery--·--- , a project designed to save the world, a project that has been in development for over four years. We are currently readying a presentation for a cloud funding campaign, We do not wish to publicly provide more information than this. If you think you might be interested, email (using the email address within my profile) me and I'll provide more information, but please keep the information private even if you decide that the project is not for you.
Looking especially for lisp programmers.
I'm not sure about the genetic code stuff.
Basically, I want to see every computer become a complex transistor.
I'm a fan of the book Permutation City :).
There was an issue with binary not creating a repetitive pattern when plotted. Sorry, it's one of those things where I remember going in with the problem and coming out with the solution and revisiting my process is on my to-do list. But basically, to solve the problem the digits from the decimal point needed to be taken into account. Makes this some kind of mixed radix system.
Ultimately, a part of this whole creation requires a non-resistant symmetry (meaning that redundancy checks naturally occur) between computers. I figured this out by basically giving all binary a numerical value. The dots to the right of the axis of that picture would be inverted numbers and colors. This is the automatic checksum between computers, entries should add to zero.
...how does one maintain a coherent reference-ability of syntax within entries...
...to answer that question I must describe the means to sequence the entries themselves...
...the sequencing scheme is: Start at 0, every new entry attaches to the next unused natural number...
...by using the sequencing scheme, an entity other than the entry creator exists to generate a sequence of numbers for use by entry creators...
...every entry sequence generator is given a unique ID to append their generated sequence number...
...EntryCreatorID to append SequenceGeneratorID and Sequence...
...[EntryCreatorID][SequenceGeneratorID][Sequence]...
...another sequence generator, this one generates creator IDs. This sequence generator must have a unique ID as well...
...[EntryCreatorID-GeneratorID][EntryCreatorID][Sequence-GeneratorID][Sequence]...
...[EntryCreatorID] can choose any [Sequence-GeneratorID] for any given entry...
...the creation and operation of any GeneratorID entity must be done with utmost transparency and fairness...
...any new ID sequenced must follow the sequencing scheme...
...develop a type of scientific notation to describe large sequence numbers...
...all of this allows for a synchronization system without the requirement of mediaries for coordination...
...this system is a little like the Dewey Decimal System...
...this is a numbering system for cataloging and referencing ideas...
...everything is sequenced in binary...
...entries are never allowed to be edited, revisions are submitted as a subset to the entry...
...it is possible for entries to be “forgotten” if nobody else looked at the entry...
...meaning if the entry exists on more than one computer, it cannot be forgotten until it is deleted from each computer...
...merely looking at entries temporarily stores the entry onto the looker’s computer...
...we each specify how we like to retain such information on our computers by default...
...every entry is actually a complicated number. [location].[syntax][content]. That’s, location, decimal point, syntax, and content...
...every single bit has an inherent location ID, its value and distance from the decimal point...
...more on that later...
...discussions to fit within the format of this structure...
...creators can choose a sequence generator to use...
...this is an information space. A data-web. A model with infinitely interconnecting parts and the potential to accommodate the rapid expansion of knowledge. Its a platform for discourse, a means to conduct rapid responses to existential risks, and a potential means to vote...
...And imagine being able to run a query to return all the tables within recorded research within a specific parameter.
Current research dissemination platforms repeat these problems with every publication:
The research is presented in a publication layout (ever try converting a research paper PDF into an ePub or simply linear text?)
Data are not stored in a data array (tables are static, values and functions used are not clear or represented in a searchable format)
Graphs and other aids are stored as images rather than vector functions
Functions per axis or table range are not reduced to a standardized, searchable, syntax
Linkage of ideas, categories, subjects, functions, and what-have-yous across research is cumbersome
Descriptions within the research are not clearly separated as nested descriptions. That is: the boundaries between descriptions are not clear. Or, when fuzziness is inherent in the subject, then the degree of fuzziness is unclear.
A means to coherently discuss the research
The process of peer review is nearly invisible; the discourse during the process of peer review is mostly unavailable; "reviewers" are basically anonymous and there is no simple way to reference their contributions to other peer reviews
There is no seamless way to reconcile information within research to other research: it can be needlessly difficult to conduct redundancy checks between studies. This process is a component of the present peer review process, but current research is not set up for continuous peer review. The processes is invisible and gives no room for research to just evolve and branch out on its own.
Matching data between hosts: Maybe this is silly but there is no good process to determine if my physical copy of a journal has no errors.
These issues by their necessity to the current platform create resistance to the expansion of our scientific knowledgebase. The dissemination of knowledge must be completely open and standardized. The issues here expressed inform the remedy’s structure, syntax, means of access, a means for discourse, and a means to represent people.
Starting now, it is important that this principle be upheld: An entity can never obtain more than one ID.
I can't post the whole thing here due to character limit....A new bbs.....something almost exactly like a .torrent file......a peer-to-peer protocol, a means to collectively yet independently, in great synchronicity, network our information......information within this system is either a location or syntax or content......all entries start with the location of the entry itself......location is...
Hello,Partner and I recently decided to get married, and that the wedding will simply be a large group game and a non-ceremonial "Signing of the Documents". Most of our friends are geeks and board-gamers, so complexity is a plus. I'm having a hard time finding a site devoted to such an activity, mostly games for campers and the like....All recommendations are appreciated, thank you :).
This problem seems concurrent to the old mystery of Viruses Spontaneously Self-Constructing On People's Computers. "How did you get all these viruses on your computer?" "I didn't do anything it just happened." "Okay, well be really careful what you click on." "I am careful!"
Thank you for your response.
Why's that?
It's been a while since I've messed about on here: http://turing.gatech.edu/ (I don't even remember if it's the same thing I was involved in)
People are pretty good at guessing whether someone is telling the truth about their identity on the internet. Anonymity adds unnecessary obfuscation, makes for a game of trying to guess the other person's perspective. Non-anonymity should be a choice, and I believe that it adds value to a person's perspective.
We need to be comfortable with the differences between persons, we do not need some cosmic blur sweeping across our identities.
The scope of parent's comment is set at generation. Or specifically "my generation", localizing the experience to a time and place.
>The answer, as with so many things in life is, "It depends." Some millennials were probably given bad information that lead them to make poor choices. Some were given bad information but nonetheless were able to see past it to make good choices. Some just had rich parents so they were able to go to college without accruing any debt at all.
I had a similar experience as parent: the hubris of college education ejaculated throughout my k-12 education. Some of us saw through the BS, but there are plenty of people wondering what the hell kind phony dream they bought into, another American dream-bubble bursting with ulterior motives.
>Lumping 80 million people together (the majority of whom will never get a degree) is silly.
Culture is amorphous and hard to grasp in the present, arguably more difficult as time passes. But there are historical themes that can be said to have affected the "mind of the generation". I would call "get a college education" one of those themes, which has been pretty consistent from my interactions with people. Example: coming from older people "are you in school?" "No." "Shame on you."
Making public another's writing may be too far.... But it would be interesting to mine the data and classify non-grammatical writing mistakes, specifically to ease the stress of grading college junior research papers -- some of which are written at a middle-school writing level -- by parsing sentences and auto-applying applicable writing mistake classification, to which I can gently glide my eyes to and convert to something intelligible.
