Zed Shaw's MulletDB: SQL in the front, NoSQL in the back

Posted by bkudria on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @05:51PM
from the mulletdb.com dept.

( 4 comments | 7 points | on HN )

Re:Zed Shaw's MulletDB: SQL in the front, NoSQL in the back by mjgoins on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @07:12PM (#1378970)

I'm having trouble picturing the implications of an AGPL database. His brief mention of "everything it talks to should be GPL" doesn't really help.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zed Shaw's MulletDB: SQL in the front, NoSQL in the back by zedshaw on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @10:00PM (#1379290)

It's the trend now in the NoSQL world, so I figured I'd try it on for size. Considering I'm really the only person I'm writing it for it's the perfect license.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zed Shaw's MulletDB: SQL in the front, NoSQL in the back by KERMIT on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @08:04PM (#1379074)

No thanks, Zed. I'll just continue to use PostgreSQL. It'll scale better, it'll be more reliable, it's a real database, and it's released under a truly free licence. Take this NoSQL crap back to Rubyland.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zed Shaw's MulletDB: SQL in the front, NoSQL in the back by zedshaw on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @09:59PM (#1379288)

Yes, I'll go right back to Rubyland where I never lived.

[ Parent | on HN ]