News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Uber Used Secret “Greyball” Tool to Deceive Authoriti... by darawk on Friday March 03, 2017 @05:02PM (#13787189)
What is the will of the people? How is it expressed? Through representative elections? What about Arrow's impossibility theorem?

The 'will of the people' on the issue of Uber is abundantly clear. Everyone wants it, except taxi drivers and the companies and structures that benefit from them. This gets blocked sometimes due to the fact that taxi drivers represent a concentrated interest against a diffuse benefit. We all benefit a little from Uber, but taxi drivers benefit a lot from killing Uber. So they raise their voices against it, and nobody speaks up for the rest of us. It is the classic problem of representative democracy. The representatives are beholden to the concentrated interests of the few against the collective interests of the many.

Re:How Uber Used Secret “Greyball” Tool to Deceive Authoriti... by nemacol on Friday March 03, 2017 @05:52PM (#13787652)
I wonder how many Uber drivers and riders vote? ~160k drivers in USA (according to their twitter posts). How many users?

Where is the pro Uber Lobby? Don't have one? Start one! You are clearly in favor of this type of program. If you truly believe that it is the right thing then be part of the solution that makes it happen.

They raised their voices against it.. You have to speak up for "the rest of us". Be the change that we need in the world.

I believe in you.

Re:How Uber Used Secret “Greyball” Tool to Deceive Authoriti... by darawk on Friday March 03, 2017 @06:11PM (#13787789)
Like I said, concentrated interests, diffuse benefits. The benefits are too small to me to be worth my time to go out and organize for it. That is why this problem exists. It is the reason why hairdressers require licenses, it is the reason why teachers can't be fired, and it is the reason why we don't have a carbon tax.

If you're arguing that all those things are good and consistent with the will of the people, then sure. I suppose that's a consistent position, even if absurd in its consequences. But I don't think for a second that you believe all three of those things are good simultaneously.