News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by Dirt_McGirt on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @01:14PM (#1377962)
Great. Now if there was a flashblocker that actually works, maybe I could switch.
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by rodion_89 on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @01:23PM (#1377981)
its built-in. scripts,cookies,flash,images,pop-ups all have built-in support to be blocked. you just turn them off and whenever a page blocks it, an icon will show up in the right end of the url bar. clicking that icon lets you manage the rights of that particular site.
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by lftl on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @03:35PM (#1378339)
I'm completely lost here. Are you saying this is built into Chrome without an extension? I've definitely never noticed anything like this. Got a post or link I can see somewhere?
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by SkyMarshal on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @04:22PM (#1378481)
Chrome -> Wrench menu ("Customize and control") -> Options -> Under the Hood -> Privacy -> Content Settings -> Plug-ins -> Disable individual plug-ins -> Disable Shockwave Flash.

If you're autoupdating Chrome, you have to get in a habit of checking the settings menu periodically for new stuff. Unlike the more mature FireFox settings menu, Chrome's is still getting additions.

Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by lftl on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @04:31PM (#1378499)
Unless I'm missing something this isn't anywhere near the functionality of Flash Block. Flash Block puts a placeholder in the spot of any SWF file it would load, and then lets me click to load the file if I want to see it, or quickly whitelist the site if I always want it to be able to load flash.

This appears to be just be turning flash on or off globally (and not very quickly either). FF has that level of control out of the box as well.

Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by swombat on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @05:55PM (#1378765)
Flashblock has been available for chrome for ages.

http://www.chromeextensions.org/appearance-functioning/flash...

Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by rodion_89 on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @10:46PM (#1379357)
turn it off. then you can quickly whitelist each site as you get to it from the icon in the right of the url bar.

the only difference that i know between this and what you explained is the lack of a placeholder image.

Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by dagw on Wednesday May 26, 2010 @03:39AM (#1379758)
If a site has one flash video I want to watch and a bunch a flash crap surrounding it that I don't want, it's nice to able to just unblock the video and not have to whitelist the entire site.
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by lftl on Wednesday May 26, 2010 @02:15PM (#1381067)
Thanks... this definitely works well enough for me. I definitely didn't expect the feature to be this accessible based on the menu settings.
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by stanleydrew on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @05:06PM (#1378628)
Yes it doesn't offer all the functionality yet, but it will get better I'm sure.
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by tedunangst on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @05:06PM (#1378629)
And how do I turn it back on for the site I'm visiting?
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by stuntmouse on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @04:16PM (#1378460)
Seconded. Can't find anything like this in the release version of the Mac build.
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by telemachos on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @01:16PM (#1377966)
The FlashBlock extension works well for me. Give it a try:

https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gofhjkjmkpinhpoi...

Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by Dirt_McGirt on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @01:36PM (#1378016)
It blocks like maybe 25% of all flash for me. Not adequate at all.
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by pavs on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @03:48PM (#1378373)
Something is wrong with your setup. I have been using that flash blocker for 2-3 months now and it blocks 100% flash objects for me both on mac and Windows, haven't tried it on Linux yet.
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by Dirt_McGirt on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @04:19PM (#1378468)
Well, I've tried it on Mac, Linux and Windows and it only blocks a minority of all flash files I've encountered. It seems especially bad with youtube and vimeo files embedded in blog posts.

In fact, I don't think it really can work in any real sense as an actual blocker since chrome doesn't provide an API for that. As I understand it, the best it can do is to remove the flash after the page has rendered.

Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by lftl on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @04:36PM (#1378520)
There are at least 3-4 competing extensions on Chrome so I'm sure there's a variability in the quality of them. This one has worked well for me:

https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/cdngiadmnkhgemki...

But what you've said is true, FF's FlashBlock has much better control over Flash because of the control it has via the API. Chrome doesn't offer the same level of control to extensions, so they're all just going rewrite the page on load. That's been good enough for me though.

Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by DrSprout on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @05:39PM (#1378714)
The point of Flashblock and NoScript is security without sacrificing usability on trusted sites. Yes, it lets you ignore the Flash, but it doesn't actually protect you because the Flash is still loaded.
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by KERMIT on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @09:45PM (#1379270)
The best Flash-blocking extension is to just not bother installing Flash in the first place.
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by Charuru on Wednesday May 26, 2010 @06:35AM (#1379963)
It comes preinstalled though.
Re:Google Chrome for Linux goes stable by dpritchett on Tuesday May 25, 2010 @03:00PM (#1378243)
I've found Privoxy to be a good ad- and flash-blocking solution for browsers that can't block well enough themselves.