Re:Lyft Is Said to Seek New Funding as Its Rival Uber Stumbles
by baddox on Thursday March 02, 2017 @02:07PM
(#13777153)
I don't follow your argument. This car example seems to qualify under your definition of thought crime.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Lyft Is Said to Seek New Funding as Its Rival Uber Stumbles
by paulddraper on Thursday March 02, 2017 @04:31PM
(#13778425)
Sorry for being unclear.
I mean to say that intent (and other aspects of mental state) can influence the severity of punishment.
It shouldn't determine whether something is legal, however.
Hitting pedestrians ought to be illegal regardless of whether you intended to do it or not.
Re:Lyft Is Said to Seek New Funding as Its Rival Uber Stumbles
by foldr on Friday March 03, 2017 @01:31PM
(#13784938)
Accidentally killing someone is not, in general, illegal. It typically would be if you did it while driving a car, as in this instance it would probably result from negligence on your part. But if you, say, trip over, bump into someone and then accidentally knock them off a ledge, you haven't committed a crime.