News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti by RussianCow on Wednesday March 01, 2017 @01:25AM (#13761695)
This is currently true, but I think this will change over time for two reasons:

1) Games are becoming less CPU-bound and are putting more work on the GPU, so the CPU matters less for gaming today than it used to.*

2) Vulkan and DirectX 12 make multi-threading easier and more efficient, so there is more incentive to adopt a parallel architecture with those APIs.

* Of course, I'm generalizing. Strategy games, for instance, are still very CPU-heavy and likely always will be.

Re:Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti by izacus on Wednesday March 01, 2017 @05:13AM (#13762645)
Still, there's diminishing returns on more cores for such uses. You can use 2 cores, might use 4 cores, having 6-8 cores is probably just cause excess heat that could be instead spent to run 4 cores at higher frequency.
Re:Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti by ulucs on Wednesday March 01, 2017 @05:21AM (#13762689)
Strategy games can also be GPU intensive if they implement neural nets instead of heuristical models
Re:Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti by untoreh on Wednesday March 01, 2017 @02:12PM (#13767149)
they would be both cpu and gpu bound at that point :)