News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares by kinkrtyavimoodh on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @04:51PM (#13758365)
Also, while it's perfectly okay for the driver to tell Travis what his concerns or pain points are, it's rather rich of him to assume that he has any context to tell Travis what business decisions make sense. As if Uber won't have charged higher prices if they could get away with it.

The CEOs being disconnected with the masses is bad, but so is the masses assuming that somehow THEY know just the right thing the CEO should have done without being privy to any of the data that a CEO has access to.

It's not too different from the arrogance you see on HN.

Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares by pjwal on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @04:56PM (#13758440)
Right, the driver didn't even know what the current Uber Black fair was...falsely claiming it was $2.75. Anyone would get annoyed when someone was telling you that you were essentially doing your job wrong but didn't even know the basic facts. In this case, these facts have a direct impact on the driver, which makes it all the more inane that he doesn't know them.
Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares by Phlarp on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @05:11PM (#13758620)
You seem really intent on defending Kalanick here so I will only post this as a reply to one of the several similar comments you've made regarding this:

> Travis is right on a technicality they did not lower Uber Black prices much if any. What they did instead was coerced Uber Black drivers to take Uber X request. Yes drivers can reject Uber X request, but if you reject a certain amount of Uber rides, they kick you off their system. Probably why the driver is complaining about going bankrupt, you need a luxury car to drive Uber Black, but if you're stuck picking Uber X fares you'll lose money.

You can't force contractors to take lower fare rides and then still claim the high ground of "we didn't lower your fares to X"

Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares by dkonofalski on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @07:08PM (#13759614)
Are you certain that's the case? I was under the impression that, while this is true for the normal classes of Uber, the UberX fares for Uber Black drivers do not count against them if they reject the fare and UberX rides are only offered to them if there is not a current Uber Black fare available in the area.
Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares by pjwal on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @06:49PM (#13759468)
That's fair enough and I see that point. My intent is not to defend Kalanick, but I do instinctually defend free markets. I think Uber and its drivers found itself in a situation with falling demand amidst rising competition.
Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares by st3v3r on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @07:12PM (#13759637)
"My intent is not to defend Kalanick, but I do instinctually defend free markets."

Even when said "free markets" cause people extreme hardship?

Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares by pjwal on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @07:27PM (#13759743)
Is there another system you know in which no one has experienced "extreme hardship?" Are you saying the driver in this article is an example of that?
Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares by dnautics on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @06:36PM (#13759379)
$2.75 a mile.
Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares by mempko on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @06:29PM (#13759319)
Replace CEO with King and business with country and you got yourself a winner.
Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares by Aeolun on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @11:33PM (#13761148)
It's fair to assume that Uber could have not lowered the prices in exchange for a smaller market share. Which would have been a pretty good arrangement for existing drivers.