Re:Uber Executive, Linked to an Old Harassment Claim, Resigns
by allengeorge on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @08:20AM
(#13753500)
That was not the statement the OP made. He said "Kalanick probably has an ordered list of employees...", which is not the same as your interpretation ("Kalanick has an ordered list of employees..."). One is a supposition, the other is an assertion.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber Executive, Linked to an Old Harassment Claim, Resigns
by washadjeffmad on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @11:28AM
(#13754922)
What they meant was, conditioned on the evidence presented about Uber's actions towards journalists, the likelihood of the existence of list of employees to fire is unaffected.
The GP tried to support the probability of their supposition with an unrelated fact, which was called out.
A person hating puppies doesn't incline them towards murder any more than liking licorice, even if both might be considered by some to be signs of character flaw or moral failing. Sometimes when there's smoke, there's just some guy trying to have a cigarette in peace away from terrible, judgemental people.