Come to think of it, we might be. I assumed we're talking about a hypothetical strong AI. After re-reading the subthread I see that 'nojvek probably meant state-of-the-art machine learning kind of AI, something that we can build now.

Half of my response still applies though. The thing with trust is that you can always call it into question. Give people a powerful AI-powered fact-finding engine, and there will still be those questioning whether you could trust the tool.