Re:Ruby on Rails 2.3.6 Released
by mhartl on Sunday May 23, 2010 @06:05PM
(#1373151)
This morning I updated the Ruby on Rails Tutorial book (http://www.railstutorial.org/) accordingly. Happily, since the changes between versions were minor, this mainly involved
Re:Ruby on Rails 2.3.6 Released
by rjett on Sunday May 23, 2010 @07:13PM
(#1373315)
I've been going through Rails Tutorial for the past few weeks. You definitely have a gift for communicating clearly and effectively. I would strongly recommend Rails Tutorial to anyone looking to get started with Rails.
Re:Ruby on Rails 2.3.6 Released
by subbu on Sunday May 23, 2010 @06:35AM
(#1372108)
Some nice changes there. Namespaces make it even more easy to work with legacy databases or mixing rails tables with say wordpress which prefixes all its tables with 'wp_'. Another nifty change w.r.t MySQL: positioning using :first => true and :after => :other_column. That allows us to keep the attributes in a nice order. Otherwise all the new columns used go below created_at and updated_at which was kind of ugly.
Re:Ruby on Rails 2.3.6 Released
by sailormoon on Sunday May 23, 2010 @10:07AM
(#1372281)
So have I actually, on some smaller projects, but it's going to be a major change to switch over larger ones. I'll be sticking on 2.3 with them for the time being.
Without this ad-hoc "fix" (well it's not a fix, I was using it just to confirm the source of the bug) I'm seeing:
Encoding::UndefinedConversionError: "\xC4" from ASCII-8BIT to UTF-8
all over the place (every time the log is flushed).
p.s. just to clarify, I was testing an app that currently runs in production on ruby 1.8.7 + rails 2.3.5 with rails 2.3.6 and ruby 1.9.2-head. 30 or so tests fail and about 70 have errors. I'll be sure to report any new bugs I find.
Re:Ruby on Rails 2.3.6 Released
by wycats on Sunday May 23, 2010 @06:33PM
(#1373198)
I'd be interested to learn where the BINARY data is coming from in the first place. For reasons I outlined in a recent blog post force_encoding is almost never a reliable general-purpose solution
Still no 1.9 for me, then :/
But all in all, this is a solid release, with many fixes and improvements. Kudos to the people who made this possible.
p.s. just to clarify, I was testing an app that currently runs in production on ruby 1.8.7 + rails 2.3.5 with rails 2.3.6 and ruby 1.9.2-head. 30 or so tests fail and about 70 have errors. I'll be sure to report any new bugs I find.