News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Announcing TypeScript 2.2 by jameslk on Wednesday February 22, 2017 @01:42PM (#13707955)
Make sure you turn on the native TypeScript Language Service feature, otherwise you'll be getting your IDE's parser, which is always behind the standard and doesn't work very well:

> Select the Use TypeScript Service check box to get native support from the TypeScript Language Service according to the up-to-date specifications. In this case syntax and error highlighting is performed based on the annotations retrieved from the TypeScript Language Service while code completion lists contain both suggestions from the TypeScript Language Service and suggestions calculated by IntelliJ IDEA itself.

https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/2016.2/typescript-suppor...

Re:Announcing TypeScript 2.2 by ng12 on Wednesday February 22, 2017 @02:01PM (#13708177)
Well that solved some problems (e.g. importing from react-router/lib/*) but autocomplete for TSX is non-functional. Still pretty frustrating considering ES6 works out of the box.
Re:Announcing TypeScript 2.2 by Rapzid on Wednesday February 22, 2017 @02:29PM (#13708416)
I've been working VS Code with TypeScript regularly for over a year now. It sounds like you want to stay in Intellij, but the language services experience in VS Code is top notch for TypeScript.
Re:Announcing TypeScript 2.2 by chaostheory on Wednesday February 22, 2017 @02:26PM (#13708393)
I could be doing things wrong but in my exp, Webstorm's autocomplete is non-existent for anything that you import
Re:Announcing TypeScript 2.2 by pierrehenrit on Thursday February 23, 2017 @03:13PM (#13717331)
I have the same issue for some of the libraries. I'm just starting with TS so it can be user error. However, I found that you can download the typings in the IDE in Settings/Javascripts/Libraries and download... This is tedious to have to do this though. Note: doing this works with normal JS as well which is pretty cool.
Re:Announcing TypeScript 2.2 by jsight on Thursday February 23, 2017 @01:29AM (#13712073)
Strange, it seems to work fine for me. Find usages on the other hand is a totally random mess.