That feels easily litigated to me. The law probably makes some statement like 'will make available'. You then go to court showing that the opportunity to rent isn't available even though there technically is a service.
Re:Starting an Internet Service Provider
by zer0t3ch on Monday February 20, 2017 @10:02PM
(#13692913)
> easily litigated
Nothing in the US is "easily" litigated, especially not when you're up against a multimedia conglomerate and a portion of the government itself.
Re:Starting an Internet Service Provider
by tnorthcutt on Monday February 20, 2017 @09:59PM
(#13692902)
"easily"
"litigated"
Those two words do not go together.
But they most certainly can impose enough bureaucracy and other hurdles to make renting factually impossible. Or simply both the incumbent provider and the county employ just a single FTE (or less!) to handle permits, and one can't do anything about it. All while following the letter of the law, because there's nothing in the law that says "county has X days to deal with the permit else it is being automatically granted".