News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Is Cancer More Common in Men? by voidlogic on Monday February 20, 2017 @01:27PM (#13689626)
>Because men receive worse medical treatment.

What about an alternative... Men are less likely to seek medical treatment?

Re:Why Is Cancer More Common in Men? by tajen on Monday February 20, 2017 @02:06PM (#13689952)
Are you suggesting men don't seek medical treatment therefore it's their fault for getting sick?

Girls often don't want to become programmers, and, as I know it, we don't say "It's their fault". We just raise the issue and everyone is fighting to make them want to become programmers.

It's way past time we apply the same reasoning to men's problems as women's problems. Males not seeking medical treatment could be because they're not aware of it (i.e. not enough funding for male diseases as female preventive programs). Or it could be because males are more suicidal about life, because they get the short end of the stick in pretty much all countries, despite the way it is framed in statistics, and we should equally fight for that. In any case, any statistics which leads to 6-year-shorter life expectancy denotes a very acute problem, for which funding should be given in equal level as for women's equality.

Re:Why Is Cancer More Common in Men? by voidlogic on Tuesday February 21, 2017 @10:45AM (#13696301)
>Are you suggesting men don't seek medical treatment therefore it's their fault for getting sick?

I made no attribution of fault... simply an alternative primary cause to the person I responded to.

Re:Why Is Cancer More Common in Men? by satysin on Monday February 20, 2017 @01:57PM (#13689888)
As a man myself it is pretty crazy to me how many men will ignore health problems to avoid going to the doctor. I am in the UK so it doesn't even cost me anything.

Yet I have had male colleagues laugh/take the piss out of me for going to the doctor. Yet I think I am the only male in the office who doesn't have some kind of chronic (or close to it) condition at 32. It seems everyone at work has back pain or some other chronic pain because they ignored it when it could have been solved easily. Now some of them need surgery for trapped nerves or slipped discs but don't treat it still! Stupidity IMHO.

The worst I know of is a guy I used to work with lost his testicles because he ignored pain and a lump which was cancer! He is lucky to still be alive.

Re:Why Is Cancer More Common in Men? by thro1111111 on Monday February 20, 2017 @01:30PM (#13689657)
What about both? Because it is both. Source: I am a man.
Re:Why Is Cancer More Common in Men? by jankotek on Monday February 20, 2017 @03:02PM (#13690394)
It does not contradict my statement. If they are less likely to seek medical treatment, they receive worse medical treatment (or no treatment at all).
Re:Why Is Cancer More Common in Men? by loteck on Monday February 20, 2017 @07:35PM (#13692279)
Worse and less are two different things. One is a judgement of quality, the other a judgement of quantity.
Re:Why Is Cancer More Common in Men? by Godel_unicode on Tuesday February 21, 2017 @12:40AM (#13693548)
Except when they're both required and neither is sufficient, as in this case. In preventative medicine, in order to have quality one must have quantity.