Re:Uber Investigating Sexual Harassment Claims by Ex-Employee
by meritt on Monday February 20, 2017 @01:17AM
(#13684788)
If HR had actually done their job, Kalanick wouldn't be spending a Sunday night struggling to reattach his unicorn's horn.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber Investigating Sexual Harassment Claims by Ex-Employee
by csharpminor on Monday February 20, 2017 @01:41AM
(#13684925)
HR is just the messenger. This rests squarely on the shoulders of Uber's management. They were informed and refused to act. The buck stops with them.
Also, having the number of woman engineers drop from 25% to less than 3% on that team should have been a red flag well in advance of this ever being published.
Re:Uber Investigating Sexual Harassment Claims by Ex-Employee
by rhizome on Monday February 20, 2017 @01:47AM
(#13684968)
There's indeed a lot to hang on upper management, but HR has responsibilities delegated to them for a reason. I'm sure heads will roll, but presumably they've been cruising without an HR reboot for years, so a lot of habits and perspectives are going to be entrenched.
Re:Uber Investigating Sexual Harassment Claims by Ex-Employee
by nedwin on Monday February 20, 2017 @02:40AM
(#13685247)
Unfortunately more often that not HR, in my limited experience, does not have these responsibilities delegated to them.
This case sounds like either completely inexperienced and untrained HRBPs OR they're being overinfluenced/overrun by management. Possibly both.
Re:Uber Investigating Sexual Harassment Claims by Ex-Employee
by rhizome on Monday February 20, 2017 @05:04AM
(#13686007)
I would guess more the former. Execs think it's boring (or worse: a blind spot), consequently don't hire well for the positions, the pretty soon the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing.