Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by Rapzid on Sunday February 19, 2017 @05:20PM
(#13682419)
I wouldn't qualify her as an industry veteran. This is not how things would have played out at a lot of the risk-adverse companies I have worked for. I'm sure it does at some places and it's no surprise to hear this about Uber TBH. Being just a couple years out of college, I'm not sure why you would expect her to understand all the shity ways the world can work.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by diziet on Sunday February 19, 2017 @05:55PM
(#13682669)
I am not sure why this post was down-voted, but the first statement is correct -- the author of the post is early in her career and is not an industry veteran. She has about 2 years of working experience, and does not qualify as an industry veteran.
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by jitl on Sunday February 19, 2017 @05:57PM
(#13682679)
What qualifications does Susan lack that would make her an "industry veteran" in your eyes?
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by diziet on Sunday February 19, 2017 @06:00PM
(#13682704)
I would say that to be called an 'industry veteran', a minimum threshold of 5 years of work experience in that industry is a reasonable qualification.
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by bayesian_horse on Monday February 20, 2017 @09:53AM
(#13687695)
I think that is debatable. She has apparently worked for four different companies, accomplished a lot and gone through quite some st already.