In general, it seems the people who are complaining about government subsidies for renewable energy development have no problems with massive government subsidies to the nuclear power industry.
I'm not anti-nuclear, per se, but given the huge potential downsides and massive lead times of current nuclear projects I don't think it's at all "ready to tackle this problem". But we should absolutely fund research into technologies like MSR, thorium, etc. We do need something to replace base loads, and I don't think biomass is going to cut it.
[0] http://www.vox.com/2016/2/29/11132930/nuclear-power-costs-us...
[1] http://web.archive.org/web/20170213025941/https://www.resear...
"France’s Nuclear Storm: Many Power Plants Down Due to Quality Concerns"
by Lee Buchsbaum - Power Magazine - (12/01/2016)
http://www.powermag.com/frances-nuclear-storm-many-power-pla...
<ost of the so-called skeptics don't know any economics beyond basic things like how to find equilibrium pricing between supply and demand curves and some outdated macroeconomic myths, but they know that the majority of people don't get economics and can be easily scared with threats of recession. That's how we wound up with a President that claims climate change is a myth created by the Chinese to steal their jobs and a dominant party that's champing at the bit to sweep away any and all environmental regulation so they can make a quick buck.