News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brilliant Jerks Cost More Than They Are Worth by omni on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @05:00PM (#13655752)
> I'll take the brilliant jerk [over the mediocre nice guy] any day.

Holy false dichotomy, Batman. I'd rather take neither of them and fill my team with adequate-to-exceptional devs who also happen to be decent human beings.

Re:Brilliant Jerks Cost More Than They Are Worth by phaed on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @05:15PM (#13655870)
Nice false trichotomy there, Joker. I'd rather have brilliant developers who are also decent human beings.
Re:Brilliant Jerks Cost More Than They Are Worth by EpicEng on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @05:38PM (#13656063)
I didn't say there's no middle ground. Of course I'd prefer the brilliant nice guy, but you don't always have that option.

I disagree on 'adequate' though. I'll take a truly brilliant a-hole over 'adequate'. 'Adequate' means I'm often fixing their mistakes, checking up on them, making sure they stay on track, etc. I'm ok with smoothing over issues from time to time if it means I can let them run wild on the thing I hired them for.

Re:Brilliant Jerks Cost More Than They Are Worth by 65827 on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @05:43PM (#13656118)
Well I'd prefer strawberry ice cream, as long as we're talking options here!
Re:Brilliant Jerks Cost More Than They Are Worth by EpicEng on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @06:00PM (#13656280)
I don't know, I'd take a good candidate at the moment. trying to fill a position currently.
Re:Brilliant Jerks Cost More Than They Are Worth by threatofrain on Thursday February 16, 2017 @08:20AM (#13659645)
If you believe that niceness (the opposite of a jerk?) and brilliance are independently varying traits, and that each are sought after in the market, then you might suspect that eventually those who have the greatest number of independently varying good traits will be more likely to be sniped up by discerning firms than not.

In which case, based on your budget, you'll have to settle with fewer and fewer desirable traits of lesser magnitude, or conversely, based on your budget, you can push more and more less desirable humans to lesser firms; one can imagine thinking the same with customers or clients as well.

You can have the nice paying client, or the jerk paying client, and a discerning firm might prefer nice paying clients over jerk paying clients (but of course, the most important discernment will be over pay), leading their competitors to have to deal with clients with a smaller set of desirable traits.

Re:Brilliant Jerks Cost More Than They Are Worth by Chris2048 on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @05:33PM (#13656020)
> I'd rather take neither of them and..

I'd rather drive a Ferarri.

Re:Brilliant Jerks Cost More Than They Are Worth by throwaway729 on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @05:46PM (#13656147)
Are brilliant & nice people really as rare as y'all seem to be suggesting? That's not my experience at all.
Re:Brilliant Jerks Cost More Than They Are Worth by Chris2048 on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @05:48PM (#13656174)
If brilliant means not mediocre, or above average, they are as rare as they are common. Depends how your budget stretches; If it doesn't, you have to make do.
Re:Brilliant Jerks Cost More Than They Are Worth by throwaway729 on Thursday February 16, 2017 @09:20AM (#13660015)
I tend to err on the side of EpicEng here. Those people are readily available and you're just not paying enough.
Re:Brilliant Jerks Cost More Than They Are Worth by EpicEng on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @07:50PM (#13657014)
Truly brilliant people are extremely rare, so I'd say yes.