News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Introducing Cloud Spanner, a Global Database Service. Parent comment

Re:Introducing Cloud Spanner, a Global Database Service by pvg on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @01:59AM (#13650250)
Did you ever read about how Netflix tried to run their own hardware but can't because they have so much data in AWS that it would basically bankrupt them to extract it?

Where did you read this? You can have Amazon send you a truck full of hard drives. I doubt it costs more than Netflix can afford.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing Cloud Spanner, a Global Database Service by throwawaydbfif on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @06:39AM (#13651295)
Nevermind, I misremembered the story I read about them. They moved the main site to AWS with the huge omission of their movie streaming system. Their own Open Connect servers are far cheaper to use for this becuase of massive AWS outbound data costs.

Also, the truck is for data in, not data out. Getting data out of AWS is far more expensive than putting it in. That's the lock in.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing Cloud Spanner, a Global Database Service by pvg on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @09:09AM (#13652065)
The 'huge omission' is by design.

Also, the truck is for data in, not data out. Getting data out of AWS is far more expensive than putting it in. That's the lock in.

This is also not true. The bulk transfer service is bi-directional.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing Cloud Spanner, a Global Database Service by bobdole1234 on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @10:59AM (#13652899)
The Open Connect servers are for the edges, not the core.

They cache popular content close to the users, they don't manage their catalog at the edges.

[ Parent | on HN ]