News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google’s not-so-secret new OS. Parent comment

Re:Google’s not-so-secret new OS by bitmapbrother on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @12:08AM (#13649860)
>The status quo right now among android hardware vendors is to violate the GPL

No it's not the status quo. The major OEM's do release their code. Yes, there are some Chinese OEM violators, but that's typical of China.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s not-so-secret new OS by grizzles on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @12:25AM (#13649937)
You can release code and still violate the GPL in other ways. For example, there are binary blobs out there and the GPL is pretty unequivocal on this point: "The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it."
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s not-so-secret new OS by simonh on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @05:32AM (#13651001)
It depends whether the binary blob is a derived work or not.

http://yarchive.net/comp/linux/gpl_modules.html

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s not-so-secret new OS by matthewmacleod on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @03:38AM (#13650586)
Releasing binary blobs is definitionally not releasing the source, though.
[ Parent | on HN ]