News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of abuse. Parent comment

Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a... by grzm on Saturday February 11, 2017 @07:33PM (#13625805)
With the widespread adoption of the term "fake news", I'm wondering what you mean by "fake information" as opposed to wrong, or false, or mistaken, or in more subtle cases, from a different perspective (think "freedom fighter" vs "terrorist"). "fake" to me implies purposeful deception. Is that what you mean here?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a... by redsummer on Saturday February 11, 2017 @08:25PM (#13626022)
It doesn't have to be deliberate, purposeful, or even conscious - though it often is. An exaggeration can be treated as fact. That fact can again be exaggerated, until the words bear no relation to reality. Wikipedia practically invented this mechanism.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a... by grzm on Saturday February 11, 2017 @08:43PM (#13626084)
I do think in that case that fake is not the right adjective to use. Every definition of fake implies intent to deceive. If you're trying to encompass the meanings you describe above, fake doesn't appear to cover it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a... by redsummer on Saturday February 11, 2017 @09:01PM (#13626175)
You are right. But I do think that what is now called "fake news" is generated by a similar mechanism. I don't know what term to use. Wrong or false don't quite cover it. Perhaps 'unmoored' - a boat can be unmoored accidentally or deliberately, or by outside events - a big wave.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a... by grzm on Saturday February 11, 2017 @09:05PM (#13626194)
Yeah, I'm not sure what the appropriate term is here, either. Perhaps contentious? disputed?

I'm still trying to get my head around what fake news is actually trying to describe. I'd like it to refer to intentional deception, but I think it's being used much more broadly than that. I fear that it's effectively meaningless at this point, other than as a generic insult.

[ Parent | on HN ]