News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel Gets Serious About Neuromorphic, Cognitive Computin... by mrfusion on Saturday February 11, 2017 @03:00PM (#13624464)
Would it be possible to build an analog neural network with hardware?
Re:Intel Gets Serious About Neuromorphic, Cognitive Computin... by emcq on Saturday February 11, 2017 @03:59PM (#13624757)
Yes, this is traditionally a big effort in the neuromorphic community originating in Carver Meads lab at Caltech.

Perhaps the best success of such analog computation efforts are with Neurogrid (full disclosure I worked with this group): https://web.stanford.edu/group/brainsinsilicon/

One thing to keep in mind is that communication is often still in digital spikes, which some may argue is more neuron like than an analog encoding.

Re:Intel Gets Serious About Neuromorphic, Cognitive Computin... by deepnotderp on Saturday February 11, 2017 @06:46PM (#13625598)
Yes, I work at a startup that's doing this, but it's very dangerous with the amounts of noise, which seem fine on MNIST and even CIFAR, but you die on imagenet.

The key to circumventing this is very complicated and our "secret sauce".

Re:Intel Gets Serious About Neuromorphic, Cognitive Computin... by 38kkdiu on Sunday February 12, 2017 @12:34PM (#13629400)
Can you say a bit more about what you mean by "it's very dangerous with the amounts of noise"?
Re:Intel Gets Serious About Neuromorphic, Cognitive Computin... by deepnotderp on Sunday February 12, 2017 @02:19PM (#13630014)
Network accuracy crashes
Re:Intel Gets Serious About Neuromorphic, Cognitive Computin... by adamnemecek on Sunday February 12, 2017 @02:56AM (#13627355)
I'm hoping that we could see photonic computers.