Re:Signal-cli: command-line and dbus interface to Signal
by ivank on Saturday February 11, 2017 @01:34PM
(#13623959)
I don't think you ever need it again, but if someone else later owns the number, they could register it with Signal and you would no longer be able to send or receive Signal messages.
Re:Signal-cli: command-line and dbus interface to Signal
by joecool1029 on Saturday February 11, 2017 @01:48PM
(#13624055)
>For registering, is it possible to use a disposable number?
Yes, I use a Google Voice number for signal. It's theoretically possible to use something like a payphone or a free inbound number from callcentric, so long as you can receive incoming calls.
It's not required again, though if someone takes over the number they can re-register on Signal. You'll stop receiving messages then, and your contacts will get a warning that your safety numbers changed.
Re:Signal-cli: command-line and dbus interface to Signal
by walterbell on Saturday February 11, 2017 @01:44PM
(#13624032)
You can use Wire's API (in alpha) without a phone number, https://github.com/wireapp/wire-bot-java && https://wire.com/en/privacy/
Re:Signal-cli: command-line and dbus interface to Signal
by saycheese on Saturday February 11, 2017 @02:13PM
(#13624179)
Wire is not Signal, right?
Re:Signal-cli: command-line and dbus interface to Signal
by qznc on Saturday February 11, 2017 @04:08PM
(#13624797)
Their protocol is derived from Signal's. I don't know how close it is. Maybe just the name, because Moxie does not like independent reimplementations.
Wire also got a favorable audit recently. https://techcrunch.com/2017/02/10/messaging-app-wire-now-has...
Re:Signal-cli: command-line and dbus interface to Signal
by walterbell on Saturday February 11, 2017 @03:15PM
(#13624539)
Signal requires a phone number, Wire does not.
For registering, is it possible to use a disposable number? If so, after the number is used for registration, is it ever required again, and exactly is it required to do?