News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Low-Cost Solution to Traffic by cortesoft on Friday February 10, 2017 @07:29PM (#13620162)
I think almost all zoning laws actually meet your definition; there are very few zoning laws (that I know of) that specify what colors or shapes you can use on your property. They all deal with things that 'leak' outside your property.

Do you have any examples of zoning or land use laws that don't fit your definition of 'things we are allowed to regulate'?

Re:A Low-Cost Solution to Traffic by bjelkeman-again on Friday February 10, 2017 @09:49PM (#13620661)
That depends on in which culture and region you live. We have just built a new garage where we live. We have a quite lenient local government and great neighbours. The local government checked with the neighbours (10 of them, nobody objected), as we needed to replace a building that was too close to the border of the property (4 meters minimum distance) with something as close as what we replaced (1.5 meter), due to layout and topology of the property.

We needed to submit drawings of the garage, explain that it fit well with the main building, a distinct house from 1909, well known in the neighbourhood. Describe the colour to be used, including the colour on the garage door.

They come and check that the foundations get placed within four inches (10 cm) of what the building permit allows.

Do I mind? No. End result is good, took longer than expected due to heavy load on the city planning department.

In some villages in Switzerland you get fined if you don't have the right colour flowers on your balcony. (Or maybe the flowers showed up on your doorstep, with a mandatory bill, without having to ask.) :)

Edit:splng

Re:A Low-Cost Solution to Traffic by ghaff on Friday February 10, 2017 @07:42PM (#13620213)
You might be surprised. There are certainly historic districts that can impose fairly explicit regulations on colors and shapes. One also reads about HOAs that cause trouble about insufficiently mowed lawns and the like although I don't know how common that is vs. "man bites dog" news stories.
Re:A Low-Cost Solution to Traffic by emodendroket on Saturday February 11, 2017 @12:23AM (#13621168)
HOAs can be all kinds of awful but they're not government entities.
Re:A Low-Cost Solution to Traffic by iopq on Friday February 10, 2017 @09:19PM (#13620569)
San Francisco zoning laws actually just flat out discourage development. This is because San Francisco property owners like that their properties are becoming worth more so they vote that way.
Re:A Low-Cost Solution to Traffic by hueving on Friday February 10, 2017 @09:45PM (#13620649)
Pretty much every hoa imposes some restriction based on looks (types of fences allowed, paint upkeep, etc).
Re:A Low-Cost Solution to Traffic by cortesoft on Monday February 13, 2017 @04:08PM (#13638779)
And HOA isn't the law, though.