Personally, I hate the whole "people have been saying this forever" type dismissals. They are "mid-brow", as PG would call it: they look intelligent on the surface by giving the illusion of a broader perspective, but don't actually address the point being brought up and don't add anything to the discussion.
Horses are still around, but the population peaked around the turn of the century (19th-20th).
How good does automation have to get before large portions of the population find themselves in the same position as early 20th century horses.
It's only a matter of time before other forms of manual labor are automated. It won't happen all at once, but gradually.
Yes, most physical labor may be automated... eventually, a lot of that is still fairly far off - we don't even have completely automated farms yet.
I'm more talking things like development, writing, design, marketing and sales. Things like that we'll probably always want some human touch to, even if it can be machine assisted in some ways.
were they wrong tho?