News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wikipedia bans Daily Mail as 'unreliable' source by al452 on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @05:57PM (#13603002)
Those of us in the UK have always known the Daily Mail is about as reliable as any other rubbish tabloid, i.e. not at all. It's always seemed strange that it has a much higher reputation in other countries. Hopefully that will change.
Re:Wikipedia bans Daily Mail as 'unreliable' source by tommorris on Thursday February 09, 2017 @04:21AM (#13605665)
I've spoken to American friends about the Mail. They mostly read it for the celebrity/gossip stories rather than relying on it for serious news.

MailOnline is far less political and far more celebrity and gossip driven than the print edition.

Re:Wikipedia bans Daily Mail as 'unreliable' source by nailer on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @06:47PM (#13603332)
Didn't the mail break the MP expenses scandal?
Re:Wikipedia bans Daily Mail as 'unreliable' source by desas on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @06:58PM (#13603410)
No that was the daily telegraph
Re:Wikipedia bans Daily Mail as 'unreliable' source by huxley on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @07:03PM (#13603431)
I'm pretty sure that was the Daily Telegraph

(oops desas beat me to it)