Re:BSDploy – FreeBSD jail provisioning
by unethical_ban on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @05:03PM
(#13602594)
I can't get my head around docker, and LXC is so much easier to understand. It's a lightweight VM, administered traditionally. It's easy!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:BSDploy – FreeBSD jail provisioning
by reacharavindh on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @09:04PM
(#13604034)
There There!
I think the same way. I feel like LXC is super powerful and flexible at the same time. Docker and all its terminology around(docker file, compose, swarm and many more) just feels like unnecessary complexity..
A few unixy scripts to automate LXC commands and The infrastructure should be set. The less wheels to grease the better at this level.
Re:BSDploy – FreeBSD jail provisioning
by xenophonf on Thursday February 09, 2017 @11:15AM
(#13607945)
I think the point of Docker (and maybe Kubernetes) is that its containers are intended to be stateless one-offs, so they aren't (and can't be) managed like a traditional server. Instead of patching a server, you'd build a new image incorporating said patches and launch that in place of the old one. It's not a bad tool for scalable services that can be stateless (i.e., not databases or file servers), even if I personally haven't quite gotten the hang of that workflow yet.