News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Apple proposes new web 3D graphics API. Parent comment

Re:Apple proposes new web 3D graphics API by xenadu02 on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @08:45PM (#13594951)
Vulkan is not suitable for exposure directly to the web. Full stop.

Therefore your posts are off-topic.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple proposes new web 3D graphics API by ioquatix on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @01:39AM (#13596299)
Do you even know how Vulkan works?

The driver API exposes a layered stack. It's trivial to add a validation layer between the driver and the client. It's SO much better than existing OpenGL or DirectX driver models for this one reason alone.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple proposes new web 3D graphics API by xenadu02 on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @04:29AM (#13596992)
Yes, I do. I'm also slightly familiar with OpenGL and Metal.

I think Metal has a better API. You are free to disagree of course.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple proposes new web 3D graphics API by vetinari on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @05:37AM (#13597274)
Metal has nice API only if you are using [ObjectiveC|Swift]. The moment you step outside (Rust, Python, ...), you have additional jumps to make.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple proposes new web 3D graphics API by toxican on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @08:03AM (#13597870)
No, I don't like your opinion, therefore you're off topic and should leave the dicussion.

/s

[ Parent | on HN ]