Re:Apple proposes new web 3D graphics API
by AsyncAwait on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @07:29PM
(#13594466)
Why are they so hostile to Vulkan and what problems does Vulkan, which is vendor independent and open, have that adding a new API to support to the pile would not?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple proposes new web 3D graphics API
by shmerl on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @07:40PM
(#13594546)
No good reason whatsoever.
Re:Apple proposes new web 3D graphics API
by MBCook on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @10:13PM
(#13595375)
Do you have a source for your claim?
Re:Apple proposes new web 3D graphics API
by shmerl on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @10:16PM
(#13595383)
Lack of known good reasons, and their major infamy in perpetuating lock-in in general. They have only themselves to blame for being seen in negative light in this topic by default.
Re:Apple proposes new web 3D graphics API
by agmcleod on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @09:06AM
(#13598234)
That doesn't mean their isn't good reason. I guess they believe they can build a better product by having control over the graphics pipeline. Obviously I cannot say for sure what they think in that regard, but neither can you.
Re:Apple proposes new web 3D graphics API
by shmerl on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @10:59AM
(#13599211)
Not very convincing. They often used excuses of good reasons to do sinister stuff, so, they'd need to work much harder to fix their ruined reputation.
Re:Apple proposes new web 3D graphics API
by hota_mazi on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @08:59PM
(#13595023)
NIAA.
Not Invented At Apple.