Re:MongoDB 3.4.0-rc3
by chx on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @03:50PM
(#13592664)
We built examiner.com on MongoDB in 2010. Yes, that was before the journal was introduced. Would you call a then Quantcast Top 100 site a "toy project"? It served well into 2016.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:MongoDB 3.4.0-rc3
by radicalbyte on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @04:18PM
(#13592897)
I said that I would only use it for a toy project. Or at least a project for whose requirements resulted in MongoDB being a good choice. For example a content site where losing some data doesn't matter and whose hot datasets would never expand above the memory available by my budget.
Given the projects I chose to work on, MongoDB would be a bad choice. So I would only use it for a toy project right now. In 3-5 years time I expect that it will be a very good choice, given that they've pretty much won and can hire all of the good engineering talent.
The parallels with MySQL are really astounding; I just hope that they don't end up being sold to Oracle or Microsoft.