News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How an obscure cult grew to become the dominant religion ... by Spooky23 on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @09:51AM (#13589683)
> That Christianity and its adherents are manipulated for political ends is a sad fact of life. This doesn't change whether or not Christianity is true, it simply confirms the biblical assertion that people are potentially naive.

Not at all, Christianity has always been practiced as a social and political construct as well as a spiritual one. That's the core of it's power. Earthly institutions don't persist for thousands of years otherwise.

You really need to look at more ancient practices that are further away from modern practice and politics. Places like England and France were transformed from a collection of warring barbarian bands to nations by the cultural standardization brought by christianity. Later reforms were driven by schisms like the reformation and other things.

Re:How an obscure cult grew to become the dominant religion ... by throwaway729 on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @10:05AM (#13589786)
> Places like England and France were transformed from a collection of warring barbarian bands to nations by the cultural standardization brought by christianity. Later reforms were driven by schisms like the reformation and other things.

IMO you have the cause and effect here completely backwards.

Re:How an obscure cult grew to become the dominant religion ... by Spooky23 on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @06:34PM (#13594103)
That's why I suggested looking further back. The medieval era, as gozer88 said, the priests were the only literate people to transmit orders and record things. They also got to define history... significant amounts of historical and contemporary knowledge at that time was always filtered through the lens of the catholic church.

Zip ahead to US colonization. Why did people come to North America? In many, if not most cases it was to escape religious prosecution or the blowback relating to that persecution.

Re:How an obscure cult grew to become the dominant religion ... by gozur88 on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @03:39PM (#13592540)
I don't think he does. When the English kings adopted Christianity, a big part of the draw (for the kings) is the church offered large numbers of literate men that could be used to extend the reach of the king's law.

There's a limit to how large your kingdom can be if people are repeating your orders and those of your court from memory.

Re:How an obscure cult grew to become the dominant religion ... by arjie on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @11:22AM (#13590393)
In A Splendid Exchange, William Bernstein actually argues that Islam acted in that direction because of how rigidly and in detail it specified trade rules. It's possible Christianity had a similar effect as well if it specified social rules.
Re:How an obscure cult grew to become the dominant religion ... by greydius on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @10:08AM (#13589801)
> transformed from a collection of warring barbarian bands to nations by the cultural standardization brought by christianity

That's a common western viewpoint. I wonder how the 'warring barbarian bands' felt about the 'cultural standardization'.

Re:How an obscure cult grew to become the dominant religion ... by Spooky23 on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @12:53PM (#13591121)
They didn't care for it very much. Unfortunately, the world doesn't revolve around happiness.

Check out the story of Alfred the Great in England. The story of England and the UK is the story of Christianity's development. The Saxon, Welsh and Norse pagans were certainly and rightfully not happy with how that transitioned, but ultimately the outcome was almost certainly for the better.