Why Databases Are Not for Docker Containers

Re:Why Databases Are Not for Docker Containers by jdc0589 on Monday February 06, 2017 @05:08PM (#13584707)

> I wonder if google has database nodes in containers?

I've been wondering this for a while. I'm sure some of the big players do it, but I'd really like to see a case study from one of them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Databases Are Not for Docker Containers by derekperkins on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @11:16AM (#13590338)

YouTube runs MySQL on Borg too, and they open sourced their management solution. - http://vitess.io

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Databases Are Not for Docker Containers by mondoshawan on Monday February 06, 2017 @08:48PM (#13586245)

Google runs MySQL on Borg internally.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Databases Are Not for Docker Containers by puzzle on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @02:26AM (#13587764)

Same for Bigtable and Spanner.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Databases Are Not for Docker Containers by ldoguin on Thursday February 09, 2017 @06:04AM (#13606065)

I assume these guys have their own network controller and kickass optic fiber links. Network attached storage in poor cloud environments leads to issues.

[ Parent | on HN ]